1. Introduction
The definition of convex function is known in the literature:
Definition 1. [Convex function]
The function , is said to be convex if the
following inequality holds
for all and We say that
is concave if is convex.
The classical Hermite-Hadamard inequality (1) which was first published in [
1] gives us an estimate of the mean value of a convex function .
In [
2], Bullen proved the following inequality (1), which is known as
Bullen’s inequality for convex function.
Let be a convex function on
the interval of real numbers and with The inequality
The history of Bullen's inequality can be found in [3].
Surveys on various generalizations and developments in inequality theory can be found in [4] and [5]. Recently in [6], the authors
established Bullen’s inequality for twice differentiable functions. In the case
where is convex then there exists an estimation better than (1).
In [
7], Farissi gave the refinement of the inequality (1)
as follows:
Theorem 2.
Assume that is a convex function on . Then
for all , we have
where
and
For more information about recent developments in above inequalities, we recommend [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12].
Preliminaries
For we have the following -type set:
The -type set of integer is defined as: the set
The -type set of the rational numbers is defined as:
The -type set of the irrational numbers is defined
as:
The -type set of the real line numbers is defined as:
If and belongs the set
of real line numbers, then we have
- and belongs the set
-
-
-
-
-
- and
Gao-Yang-Kang’s [
13,
14] introduced the idea the local fractional
derivative and local fractional integral.
Definition 3.
[13]yang} A non-differentiable function is local fractional continuous at ,
if for any there exists such that
holds for where We denote the set of all locally fractional continuous functions on by
Definition 4.
[13] The local fractional derivative of of order at is defined as:
where
If there exists for any then
we say that where
Definition 5.
[13]yang} Let Then the local
fractional integral is defined by,
with and make it clear
and is
partition of interval
Here, it follows that if and if If for any there exists then we say that
Definition 6. [Generalized convex function]
[13]Let For any and if
holds, then is a generalized convex function on
Here are two basic examples of generalized convex functions:
-
- where is
the Mittag-Leffler function.
Theorem 7.
[15] Let then the followings are
equivalent
- [a)] is a generalized convex function on .
- [b)] is an increasing function on .
- [c)] for any
Corollary 8.
[15] Let Then is a generalized convex
function (or a generalized concave function) if and only if
for all
Lemma 9.
[13]
- (Local fractional integration is anti-differentiation) Suppose that then we have
- (Local fractional integration by parts) Suppose that and then we have
Lemma 10.
[13] We have
-
-
Lemma 11.
[13] Suppose that
then
Lemma 12. [Generalized H\”{o}lder’s inequality]
[13] Let
with then
In [
15], Mo
et al. proved the following generalized Hermite-Hadamard
inequality for generalized convex function:
Theorem 13. [Generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality]
Let be a
generalized convex function on with . Then
Sarikaya and Budak [
16] gave a weighted generalization of the inequality (2).
Theorem 14. [Hermite–Hadamard-Fejér inequality]
Let be a generalized convex
function on with . If is nonnegative, local fractional integrable and
symmetric then the following inequality for local
fractional integrals hold
The interested reader can read [
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21].
In this paper, we firstly establish generalized Hermite–Hadamard-Fejér
inequality via local fractional integrals. Then, we obtain several
inequalities related the right side of this inequality using the local
fractional integrals and generalized convex functions.
3. Main results
Lemma 15.
Let with and If \ , then, for all
, the following identity holds:
Proof.
From local fractional integration by parts, we have
This completes the proof.
Remark 1.
In Lemma 15, let be a symmetric to and . Then 2.1 can be written as
Theorem 16.
Let with and let
, \ and \ is generalized convex on Then,
for all , we have
Proof.
Let Using Lemma 15 and the generalized
convexty of we have
Now by variable exchange method, we have
and
Using (7)-(10) in (6) we obtain
Since we have
Hence, the proof is completed.
Using Theorem 16, we have the following corollaries which are connected
with the right-hand side of Fejér inequality.
Corollary 17.
Let \ and in
Theorem 16. Then we have
Corollary 18.
Let be a symmetric
to and in Corollary 17. Then we
have the inequality
which is the weighted trapezoid inequality provided that
is generalized convex \ on
Proof.
Using the symmetry of , we have the following identity
From this identity and Corollary 17, we have the inequality (11). This completes the proof.
Remark 2.
If we choose on then we obtain
following the inequality from (11)
Remark 3.
Let be a generalized convex function
on with and let with symmetric to Then (11) is an
error bound of the second inequality in generalized Fejér inequality
provided that is
generalized convex on and \
Theorem 19.
Let with and let
, If is generalized convex on with then, for all ,
the following inequality holds:
Proof.
Let , Lemma 15, generalized H\”{o}lder’s
inequality and the generalized convexity of it follows that
and this completes the proof.
Using Theorem 19, we have the following corollaries which are connected
with the right-hand side of Fejér inequality.
Corollary 20 Let and in
Theorem 5. Then we have the inequality
Corollary 21.
Let be a symmetric
to and in Corollary 20. Then we
have the inequality
which is the weighted trapezoid inequality provided that is generalized convex \ on and
where
Remark 4.
If we choose on then we obtain
following the inequality from (9)
Remark 5.
Let\ , be a generalized convex
and let with symmetric to Using Corollary 21, we obtain an error bound of the
second inequality in generalized Fejér inequality
provided that is generalized convex \ on and
app
4.Applications to Weighted Trapezoided Formula
Throughout this section, let , and let \ be a partition of and Define
Proposition 22.
Let with and let Let is a generalized convex
on . Then we have
Proof.
Using (12) the following inequality holds
Hence in the trapezoidal case
This completes the proof.
Proposition 23.
Let with and let Let is a
generalized convex on with . Then we have
Proof.
Using (16) the following inequality holds
Hence in the trapezoidal case
This completes the proof.
Proposition 24.
Let be defined as in Corollary (18). Then we have
Proof.
Apply Corollary 18 on to
get
Using (20), the generalized triangle and the generalized convexity of
, we have the inequality (
19). This completes the proof.
Remark 6.
If we choose on then we the
inequality (19) reduces to (17).
Proposition 25.
Let and be defined as in Theorem 16. Then we have
Proof.
The proof uses Corollary 21 and similar to that of Proposition 24.
Remark 7
If we choose on then we the
inequality (21) reduces to (18).
5. Some Inequalities For Random Variables
Throughout this section, let , , and let be a continuous
random variable, be probability
density function of which is symmetric to and the
which is assumed to be finite.
Theorem 26.
Proof.
Let in Corollary 18. Then we have the following identities
and
Using the above identities and the inequality (11
), we have the inequality (22). This completes the proof.
Remark 8.
If we choose in Theorem (26), then we have the following
inequality
where is the generalized expectation of the random variable
6. Conclusion
We have extend some estimates of the right hand side of a Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequality for generalized convex functions
whose derivatives absolute values are generalized convex via local fractional integrals. We have introduced some inequalities for random variables and applications to weighted trapezoided formula on local fractional integrals.
Acknowledgments
The authors wishes to express his profound gratitude to the reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing Interests
The author(s) do not have any competing interests in the manuscript.