On Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type integral inequalities for generalized convex functions via local fractional integrals

Author(s): Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya1, Necmettin Alp1
1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Düzce University, Düzce, Turkey.
Copyright © Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya, Necmettin Alp. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this paper, we extend some estimates of the right hand side of a Hermite- Hadamard-Fejér type inequality for generalized convex functions whose derivatives absolute values are generalized convex via local fractional integrals.

Keywords: Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality, generalized convex function, local fractional integral, generalized Hölder’s inequality.

1. Introduction

The definition of convex function is known in the literature:

Definition 1. [Convex function] The function f:[a,b]RR, is said to be convex if the following inequality holds f(tx+(1t)y)tf(x)+(1t)f(y) for all x,y[a,b] and t[0,1]. We say that f is concave if (f) is convex.

The classical Hermite-Hadamard inequality (1) which was first published in [1] gives us an estimate of the mean value of a convex function f:IR.
f(a+b2)1baabf(x)dxf(a)+f(b)2
(1)
In [2], Bullen proved the following inequality (1), which is known as Bullen’s inequality for convex function.

Let f:IRR be a convex function on the interval I of real numbers and a,bI with a<b. The inequality 1baabf(x)dx12[f(a+b2)+f(a)+f(b)2]. The history of Bullen's inequality can be found in [3]. Surveys on various generalizations and developments in inequality theory can be found in [4] and [5]. Recently in [6], the authors established Bullen’s inequality for twice differentiable functions. In the case where f is convex then there exists an estimation better than (1).

In [7], Farissi gave the refinement of the inequality (1) as follows:

Theorem 2. Assume that f:IR is a convex function on I. Then for all λ[0,1], we have f(a+b2)l(λ)1baabf(x)dxL(λ)f(a)+f(b)2, where l(λ):=λf(λb+(2λ)a2)+(1λ)f((1+λ)b+(1λ)a2) and L(λ):=12(f(λb+(1λ)a)+λf(a)+(1λ)f(b)).

For more information about recent developments in above inequalities, we recommend [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

Preliminaries

For 0<α1, we have the following α-type set:
The α-type set of integer is defined as: the set Zα:={0α,±1α,±2α,,±nα,}.
The α-type set of the rational numbers is defined as: Qα:={mα=(pq)α: p,qZ, q0}.
The α-type set of the irrational numbers is defined as: Jα:={mα(pq)α: p,qZ, q0}.
The α-type set of the real line numbers is defined as: Rα:=QαJα.
If aα,bα and cα belongs the set Rα of real line numbers, then we have
  1. aα+bα and aαbα belongs the set Rα;
  2. aα+bα=bα+aα=(a+b)α=(b+a)α;
  3. aα+(bα+cα)=(a+b)α+cα;
  4. aαbα=bαaα=(ab)α=(ba)α;
  5. aα(bαcα)=(aαbα)cα;
  6. aα(bα+cα)=aαbα+aαcα;
  7. aα+0α=0α+aα=aα and aα1α=1αaα=aα.
Gao-Yang-Kang’s [13, 14] introduced the idea the local fractional derivative and local fractional integral.

Definition 3. [13]yang} A non-differentiable function f:RRα, xf(x) is local fractional continuous at x0, if for any ε>0, there exists δ>0, such that |f(x)f(x0)|<εα holds for |xx0|<δ, where ε,δR. We denote the set of all locally fractional continuous functions on (a,b) by Cα(a,b).

Definition 4. [13] The local fractional derivative of f(x) of order α at x=x0 is defined as: f(α)(x0)=dαf(x)dxα|x=x0=limxx0Δα(f(x)f(x0))(xx0)α, where Δα(f(x)f(x0))=~Γ(α+1)(f(x)f(x0)).

If there exists f(k+1)α(x)=DxαDxαk+1 timesf(x) for any xIR, then we say that fD(k+1)α(I), where k=0,1,2,.

Definition 5. [13]yang} Let f(x)Cα[a,b]. Then the local fractional integral is defined by, aIbαf(x)=1Γ(α+1)abf(t)(dt)α=1Γ(α+1)limΔt0j=0N1f(tj)(Δtj)α, with Δtj=tj+1tj and Δt=max{Δt1,Δt2,,ΔtN1}, make it clear [tj,tj+1], j=0,,N1 and a=t0<t1<...<tN1<tN=b is partition of interval [a,b]. Here, it follows that aIbαf(x)=0 if a=b and aIbαf(x)=bIaαf(x) if a<b. If for any x[a,b], there exists aIxαf(x), then we say that f(x)Ixα[a,b].

Definition 6. [Generalized convex function] [13]Let f:IRRα. For any x1,x2I and λ[0,1], if f(λx1+(1λ)x2)λαf(x1)+(1λ)αf(x2) holds, then f is a generalized convex function on I.

Here are two basic examples of generalized convex functions:
  1. f(x)=xαp, x0, p>1;
  2. f(x)=Eα(xα), xR where Eα(xα)=k=0xαkΓ(1+kα) is the Mittag-Leffler function.

Theorem 7. [15] Let fDα(I), then the followings are equivalent

  1. [a)] f is a generalized convex function on I.
  2. [b)] f(α) is an increasing function on I.
  3. [c)] for any x1,x2I, f(x2)f(x1)f(α)(x1)Γ(1+α)(x2x1)α.

Corollary 8. [15] Let fD2α(a,b). Then f is a generalized convex function (or a generalized concave function) if and only if f(2α)(x)0(or f(2α)(x)0) for all x(a,b).

Lemma 9. [13]

  1. (Local fractional integration is anti-differentiation) Suppose that f(x)=g(α)(x)Cα[a,b], then we have aIbαf(x)=g(b)g(a).
  2. (Local fractional integration by parts) Suppose that f(x),g(x)Dα[a,b] and f(α)(x), g(α)(x)Cα[a,b], then we have aIbαf(x)g(α)(x)=f(x)g(x)|abaIbαf(α)(x)g(x).

Lemma 10. [13] We have

  1. dαxkαdxα=Γ(1+kα)Γ(1+(k1)α)x(k1)α;
  2. 1Γ(α+1)abxkα(dx)α=Γ(1+kα)Γ(1+(k+1)α)(b(k+1)αa(k+1)α), kR.

Lemma 11. [13] Suppose that f(x)Cα[a,b], then dα(aIxαf(t))dxα=f(x) \ a<x<b.

Lemma 12. [Generalized H\”{o}lder’s inequality] [13] Let f,gCα[a,b], p,q>1 with 1p+1q=1, then 1Γ(α+1)ab|f(x)g(x)|(dx)α(1Γ(α+1)ab|f(x)|p(dx)α)1p(1Γ(α+1)ab|g(x)|q(dx)α)1q.

In [15], Mo et al. proved the following generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality for generalized convex function:

Theorem 13. [Generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality] Let f(x)Ix(α)[a,b] be a generalized convex function on [a,b] with a<b. Then

f(a+b2)Γ(1+α)(ba)α aIbαf(x)f(a)+f(b)2α.
(2)

Sarikaya and Budak [16] gave a weighted generalization of the inequality (2).

Theorem 14. [Hermite–Hadamard-Fejér inequality] Let f(x)Ix(α)[a,b] be a generalized convex function on [a,b] with a<b. If g:[a,b]Rα is nonnegative, local fractional integrable and symmetric a+b2, then the following inequality for local fractional integrals hold

f(a+b2) aIb(α)g(x) aIb(α)f(x)g(x)f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(x).
(3)

The interested reader can read [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. In this paper, we firstly establish generalized Hermite–Hadamard-Fejér inequality via local fractional integrals. Then, we obtain several inequalities related the right side of this inequality using the local fractional integrals and generalized convex functions.

3. Main results

Lemma 15. Let f(x)Dα[a,b] with a<b and g(x)Cα[a,b]. If \ f(α)Ix(α)[a,b], then, for all x[a,b] , the following identity holds:

f(a)aIx(α)g(s)+f(b)xIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)=1Γ(1+α)ab[1Γ(1+α)xtg(s)(ds)α]f(α)(t)(dt)α.
(4)

Proof. From local fractional integration by parts, we have 1Γ(1+α)ab[1Γ(1+α)xtg(s)(ds)α]f(α)(t)(dt)α=[(1Γ(1+α)xtg(s)(ds)α)f(t)]ab1Γ(1+α)abf(t)g(t)(dt)α=1Γ(1+α)[f(b)xbg(s)(ds)αf(a)xag(s)(ds)αabf(t)g(t)(dt)α]=1Γ(1+α)[f(a)axg(s)(ds)α+f(b)xbg(s)(ds)αabf(t)g(t)(dt)α]=f(a)aIx(α)g(s)+f(b)xIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s). This completes the proof.

Remark 1. In Lemma 15, let g be a symmetric to (a+b)/2 and x=(a+b)/2. Then 2.1 can be written as f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(s) aIb(α)f(s)g(s)=1Γ(1+α)ab[1Γ(1+α)a+b2tg(s)(ds)α]f(α)(t)(dt)α.

Theorem 16. Let f(x)Dα[a,b] with a<b and let f(α)Ix(α)[a,b], g(x)Cα[a,b]\ and  |f(α)|\ is generalized convex on [a,b]. Then, for all x[a,b], we have |f(a)aIx(α)g(s)+f(b)xIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|[(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(bx)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(xa)α)(xa)2αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α))(bx)3αg[x,b],]|f(α)(a)|(ba)α+[(Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(xa)3αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(xa)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(bx)α)(bx)2αg[x,b],]|f(α)(b)|(ba)α

g[a,b],(ba)α([Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)[(xb)α(xa)2α+(bx)3α]+Γ(2+α)Γ(2+2α)[(xa)3α(bx)3α]]|f(α)(a)|×[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)[(xa)α(bx)2α(xa)3α]+Γ(2+α)Γ(2+2α)[(xa)3α+(bx)3α]]|f(α)(b)|).
(5)

Proof. Let x[a,b]. Using Lemma 15 and the generalized convexty of  |f(α)|, we have

|f(a)aIx(α)g(s)+f(b)xIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|1Γ(1+α)(ax|1Γ(1+α)xtg(s)(ds)α||f(α)(t)|(dt)α+xb|1Γ(1+α)xtg(s)(ds)α||f(α)(t)|(dt)α)1Γ(1+α)(g[a,x],ax(xt)α|f(α)(t)|(dt)α+g[x,b],xb(tx)α|f(α)(t)|(dt)α)=g[a,x],Γ(1+α)ax(xt)α|f(α)(btbaa+tabab)|(dt)α+g[x,b],Γ(1+α)xb(tx)α|f(α)(btbaa+tabab)|(dt)α1Γ(1+α)[g[a,x],(ba)α(|f(α)(a)|ax(xt)α(bt)α(dt)α+|f(α)(b)|ax(xt)α(ta)α(dt)α)+g[x,b],(ba)α(|f(α)(a)|xb(tx)α(bt)α(dt)α+|f(α)(b)|xb(tx)α(ta)α(dt)α)].
(6)
Now by variable exchange method, we have
1Γ(1+α)ax(xt)α(bt)α(dt)α=[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(bx)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(xa)α](xa)2α,
(7)
1Γ(1+α)ax(xt)α(ta)α(dt)α=[Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)](xa)3α,
(8)
1Γ(1+α)xb(tx)α(bt)α(dt)α=[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)](bx)3α,
(9)
and
1Γ(1+α)xb(tx)α(ta)α(dt)α=[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(xa)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(bx)α](bx)2α.
(10)
Using (7)-(10) in (6) we obtain |f(a)aIx(α)g(x)+f(b)xIb(α)g(x)aIb(α)f(x)g(x)|[(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(bx)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(xa)α)(xa)2αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α))(bx)3αg[x,b],]|f(α)(a)|(ba)α+[(Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(xa)3αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(xa)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(bx)α)(bx)2αg[x,b],]|f(α)(b)|(ba)α. Since g[a,x],,g[x,b],g[a,b],, we have |f(a)aIx(α)g(x)+f(b)xIb(α)g(x)aIb(α)f(x)g(x)|[(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(bx)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(xa)α)(xa)2αg[a,x], +(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α))(bx)3αg[x,b],]|f(α)(a)|(ba)α+[(Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(xa)3αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(xa)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(bx)α)(bx)2αg[x,b],]|f(α)(b)|(ba)αg[a,b],(ba)α([Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)[(xb)α(xa)2α+(bx)3α]+Γ(2+α)Γ(2+2α)[(xa)3α(bx)3α]]|f(α)(a)|[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)[(xa)α(bx)2α(xa)3α]+Γ(2+α)Γ(2+2α)[(xa)3α+(bx)3α]]|f(α)(b)|). Hence, the proof is completed.

Using Theorem 16, we have the following corollaries which are connected with the right-hand side of Fejér inequality.

Corollary 17. Let \ 0λ1 and x=λa+(1λ)b in Theorem 16. Then we have |f(a)aI(λa+(1λ)b)(α)g(s)+f(b)(λa+(1λ)b)Ib(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|[(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)λα+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(1λ)α)(1λ)2αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α))λ3αg[x,b],](ba)2α|f(α)(a)|+[(Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))(1λ)3αg[a,x],+(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(1λ)α+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)λα)λ2αg[x,b],](ba)2α|f(α)(b)|([Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(λα(1λ)2α+λ3α)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)((1λ)3αλ3α)]|f(α)(a)|+[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)((1λ)αλ2α(1λ)3α)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)((1λ)3α+λ3α)]|f(α)(b)|)(ba)2αg[a,b],.

Corollary 18. Let g:[a,b]Rα be a symmetric to (a+b)/2 and λ=1/2 in Corollary 17. Then we have the inequality

|f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(g[a,x],+g[x,b],)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(g[a,x],g[x,b],)](ba)2α|f(α)(a)|23α+[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(g[x,b],g[a,x],)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(g[a,x],+g[x,b],)](ba)2α|f(α)(b)|23α(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|)(ba)2αg[a,b],22α
(11)
which is the weighted trapezoid inequality provided that |f(α)| is generalized convex \ on [a,b].

Proof. Using the symmetry of g, we have the following identity f(a)aIa+b2(α)g(x)+f(b)a+b2Ib(α)g(x)aIb(α)f(x)g(x)=f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(x)aIb(α)f(x)g(x). From this identity and Corollary 17, we have the inequality (11). This completes the proof.

Remark 2. If we choose g(t)=1α on [a,b], then we obtain following the inequality from (11)

|f(a)+f(b)2αΓ(1+α)(ba)αaIb(α)f(s)|(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|)(ba)2α22α
(12)

Remark 3. Let f(x)Dα[a,b] be a generalized convex function on [a,b] with a<b and let g(x)Cα[a,b] with symmetric to (a+b)/2. Then (11) is an error bound of the second inequality in generalized Fejér inequality 0f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(s) aIb(α)f(s)g(s)[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(g[a,x],+g[x,b],)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(g[a,x],g[x,b],)](ba)2α|f(α)(a)|23α+[Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(g[x,b],g[a,x],)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)(g[a,x],+g[x,b],)](ba)2α|f(α)(b)|23α(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|)(ba)2αg[a,b],22α provided that |f(α)| is generalized convex on [a,b] and \ f(α)Ix(α)[a,b].

Theorem 19. Let f(x)Dα[a,b] with a<b and let f(α)Ix(α)[a,b], g(x)Cα[a,b]. If |f(α)|p/(p1) is generalized convex on [a,b] with p>1, then, for all x [a,b], the following inequality holds:

|f(a)aIx(α)g(s)+f(b)xIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|(ba)αp1pg[a,b],Γ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p((xa)(p+1)α(bx)(p+1)α)1p.(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(a)|pp1+|f(α)(b)|pp1]p1p.
(13)

Proof. Let x[a,b], Lemma 15, generalized H\”{o}lder’s inequality and the generalized convexity of |f(α)|p/(p1), it follows that |f(a)aIx(α)g(s)+f(b)xIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|[1Γ(1+α)ab|1Γ(1+α)xtg(s)(ds)α|p(dt)α]1p[1Γ(1+α)ab|f(α)(t)|pp1(dt)α]p1pg[a,b],Γ(1+α)[1Γ(1+α)ab|tx|αp(dt)α]1p×[1Γ(1+α)ab((bt)α(ba)α|f(α)(a)|pp1+(ta)α(ba)α|f(α)(b)|pp1)(dt)α]p1p=g[a,b],Γ(1+α)[1Γ(1+α)ax(xt)αp(dt)α+1Γ(1+α)xb(tx)αp(dt)α]1p×[|f(α)(a)|pp1(ba)α1Γ(1+α)ab(bt)α(dt)α+|f(α)(b)|pp1(ba)α1Γ(1+α)ab(ta)α(dt)α]p1p=g[a,b],Γ(1+α)[Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α)((xa)(p+1)α+(bx)(p+1)α)]1p ×[|f(α)(a)|pp1(ba)αΓ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(ba)2α+|f(α)(b)|pp1(ba)αΓ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)(ba)2α]p1p=(ba)αp1pg[a,b],Γ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p((xa)(p+1)α+(bx)(p+1)α)1p×(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(a)|pp1+|f(α)(b)|pp1]p1p and this completes the proof.

Using Theorem 19, we have the following corollaries which are connected with the right-hand side of Fejér inequality.

Corollary 20 Let 0λ1 and x=λa+(1λ)b in Theorem 5. Then we have the inequality

|f(a)aIλa+(1λ)b(α)g(s)+f(b)λa+(1λ)bIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|(ba)2αg[a,b],Γ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p((1λ)(p+1)α+λ(p+1)α)1p×(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(a)|pp1+|f(α)(b)|pp1]p1p.
(14)

Corollary 21. Let g:[a,b]Rα be a symmetric to (a+b)/2 and λ=1/2 in Corollary 20. Then we have the inequality

|f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)|(ba)2αg[a,b],2αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p×(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(a)|pp1+|f(α)(b)|pp1]p1p.
(15)
which is the weighted trapezoid inequality provided that |f(α)|p/(p1) is generalized convex \ on [a,b] and f(α)Ix(α)[a,b]. where p>1.

Remark 4. If we choose g(t)=1α on [a,b], then we obtain following the inequality from (9)

|f(a)+f(b)2αΓ(1+α)(ba)αaIb(α)f(s)|(ba)2α2αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p×(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(a)|pp1+|f(α)(b)|pp1]p1p.
(16)

Remark 5. Let\ p>1, f(x)Dα[a,b] be a generalized convex and let g(x)Cα[a,b] with symmetric to (a+b)/2. Using Corollary 21, we obtain an error bound of the second inequality in generalized Fejér inequality 0f(a)+f(b)2α aIb(α)g(s)aIb(α)f(s)g(s)(ba)2αg[a,b],2αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p×(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(a)|pp1+|f(α)(b)|pp1]p1p provided that |f(α)|p/(p1) is generalized convex \ on [a,b] and f(α)Ix(α)[a,b].

app

4.Applications to Weighted Trapezoided Formula

Throughout this section, let  g(x)Cα[a,b], fIx(α)[a,b] and let \ In:a=x0<x1<<xn=b be a partition of [a,b] and li=xi+1xi(i=0,1,,n1). Define Tα(f,In)=1Γ(1+α)n1i=0f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αliα,Eα(f,In)= aIb(α)f(x)Tα(f,In),Tα(f,g,In)=1Γ(1+α)n1i=0[f(xi)xixi+xi+12g(s)(ds)α+f(xi+1)xi+xi+12xi+1g(s)(ds)α],Eα(f,g,In)= aIb(α)f(x)g(x)Tα(f,g,In).

Proposition 22. Let f(x)Dα[a,b] with a<b and let f(α)Ix(α)[a,b]. Let |f(α)| is a generalized convex on [a,b]. Then we have

|Eα(f,In)|122αn1i=0(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(xi)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(xi+1)|)li2αmax{Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|}22αn1i=0li2α.
(17)

Proof. Using (12) the following inequality holds |f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αΓ(1+α) liα xiIxi+1(α)f(s)|(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(xi)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(xi+1)|)li2α22α. Hence in the trapezoidal case |Tα(f,In) aIb(α)f(x)|=|n1i=0{f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αΓ(1+α)liα1Γ(1+α)xixi+1f(s)(ds)α}|n1i=0|f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αΓ(1+α)liα1Γ(1+α)xixi+1f(s)(ds)α|n1i=0(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(xi)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(xi+1)|)li2α22α=122αn1i=0(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(xi)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(xi+1)|)li2αmax{Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|}22αn1i=0li2α. This completes the proof.

Proposition 23. Let f(x)Dα[a,b] with a<b and let f(α)Ix(α)[a,b]. Let |f(α)|pp1is a generalized convex on [a,b] with p>1. Then we have

|Eα(f,In)|12αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p×(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1pi=0n1[|f(α)(xi)|pp1+|f(α)(xi+1)|pp1]p1pli2α12αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1pmax{|f(α)(xi)|,|f(α)(xi+1)|}n1i=0li2α
(18)

Proof. Using (16) the following inequality holds |f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αΓ(1+α) liα xiIxi+1(α)f(s)|li2α2αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(xi)|pp1+|f(α)(xi+1)|pp1]p1p. Hence in the trapezoidal case |Tα(f,In) aIb(α)f(x)|=|n1i=0{f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αΓ(1+α)liα1Γ(1+α)xixi+1f(s)(ds)α}|n1i=0|f(xi)+f(xi+1)2αΓ(1+α)liα1Γ(1+α)xixi+1f(s)(ds)α|n1i=0li2α2αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p[|f(α)(xi)|pp1+|f(α)(xi+1)|pp1]p1pn1i=0li2α2αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1pmax{|f(α)(xi)|,|f(α)(xi+1)|}12αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1pmax{|f(α)(xi)|,|f(α)(xi+1)|}n1i=0li2α. This completes the proof.

Proposition 24. Let f be defined as in Corollary (18). Then we have

|Eα(f,In)|122αn1i=0(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(xi)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(xi+1)|)li2αg[xi,xi+1],max{Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|}22αn1i=0li2αg[xi,xi+1],.
(19)

Proof. Apply Corollary 18 on [xi,xi+1](i=0,1,,n1) to get

|f(xi)1Γ(1+α)xixi+xi+12g(s)(ds)α+f(xi+1)1Γ(1+α)xi+xi+12xi+1g(s)(ds)α1Γ(1+α)xixi+1f(s)(ds)α|(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)|f(α)(a)|+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)|f(α)(b)|)li2αg[xi,xi+1],22α
(20)
Using (20), the generalized triangle and the generalized convexity of |f(α)|, we have the inequality ( 19). This completes the proof.

Remark 6. If we choose g(t)=1α on [a,b], then we the inequality (19) reduces to (17).

Proposition 25. Let p>1 and f be defined as in Theorem 16. Then we have |Eα(f,In)|12αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p×i=0n1[|f(α)(xi)|pp1+|f(α)(xi+1)|pp1]p1pli2αg[xi,xi+1],12αΓ(1+α)(Γ(1+pα)Γ(1+(p+1)α))1p(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α))p1p

×max{|f(α)(xi)|,|f(α)(xi+1)|}n1i=0li2αg[xi,xi+1],.
(21)

Proof. The proof uses Corollary 21 and similar to that of Proposition 24.

Remark 7 If we choose g(t)=1α on [a,b], then we the inequality (21) reduces to (18).

5. Some Inequalities For Random Variables

Throughout this section, let 0<a<b, r1, and let X be a continuous random variable, g(x)Cα[a,b] be probability density function of X which is symmetric to (a+b)/2 and the rmoment Erα(X)=1Γ(α+1)absrαg(s)(ds)α which is assumed to be finite.

Theorem 26.

|Erα(X)ar+br2α aIb(α)g(s)|(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)ar1+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α)br1)r(ba)2αg[a,b],22α.
(22)

Proof. Let f(s)=sr (s[a,b]) in Corollary 18. Then we have the following identities 1Γ(α+1)abf(s)g(s)(ds)α=Erα(X),f(a)+f(b)2α1Γ(α+1)abg(s)(ds)α=ar+br2α aIb(α)g(s) and |f(α)(a)|=rar1 and |f(α)(b)|=rbr1. Using the above identities and the inequality (11 ), we have the inequality (22). This completes the proof.

Remark 8. If we choose r=1 in Theorem (26), then we have the following inequality |Eα(X)a+b2α aIb(α)g(s)|(Γ(1+α)Γ(1+2α)+Γ(1+2α)Γ(1+3α))(ba)2αg[a,b],22α where E(X) is the generalized expectation of the random variable X.

6. Conclusion

We have extend some estimates of the right hand side of a Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequality for generalized convex functions whose derivatives absolute values are generalized convex via local fractional integrals. We have introduced some inequalities for random variables and applications to weighted trapezoided formula on local fractional integrals.

Acknowledgments

The authors wishes to express his profound gratitude to the reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The author(s) do not have any competing interests in the manuscript.

References

  1. Hadamard, J., (1893). Etude sur les proprietes des fonctions entieres et en particulier d’une fonction consideree par Riemann. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 58, 171–215. [Google Scholor]
  2. Bullen, P. S. (1978). Error estimates for some elementary quadrature rules. Publikacije Elektrotehnickog fakulteta. Serija Matematika i fizika, (602/633), 97-103. [Google Scholor]
  3. Dragomir, S. S. & Pearce, C. E. M., (2000). Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications. RGMIA Monographs, Victoria University.[Google Scholor]
  4. Mitrinovic, D. S., Pecaric, J., & Fink, A. M. (2013). Classical and new inequalities in analysis (Vol. 61). Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholor]
  5. Dragomir, S. S. & Agarwal, R.P., (1998). Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Applied Mathematics Letters, 11(5), 91–95.[Google Scholor]
  6. El Farissi, A., Latreuch, Z. & Belaidi, B. (2009). Hadamard-Type inequalities for twice diffrentiable functions. RGMIA Research Report collection, 1 12, art. 6. [Google Scholor]
  7. El Farissi, A. (2010). Simple proof and refinement of Hermite-Hadamard inequality. Journal of Mathematical Inequalities,4(3), 365–369. [Google Scholor]
  8. Gao, X. (2010). A note on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality. Journal of Mathematical Inequalities, 4(4), 587–591. [Google Scholor]
  9. Kirmaci, U. S., & Ozdemir, M. E., (2004). On some inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to midpoint formula. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 153, 361–368. [Google Scholor]
  10. Kirmaci, U. S. & Dikici, R., (2013). On some Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for twice differentiable mappings and applications. Tamkang Journal of Mathematics,1, 41–51. [Google Scholor]
  11. Kirmaci, U. S., (2004). Inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to midpoint formula. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 147, 137–146. [Google Scholor]
  12. Sarikaya, M. Z. & Yaldiz, H., (2013). On the Hadamard’s type inequalities for $L$-Lipschitzian mapping. Konuralp Journal of Mathematics,1(2), 33–40. [Google Scholor]
  13. Yang, X. J., (2012). Advanced Local Fractional Calculus and Its Applications. World Science Publisher, New York. [Google Scholor]
  14. Yang, Y. J., Baleanu, D., & Yang, X. J. (2013). Analysis of fractal wave equations by local fractional Fourier series method. Advances in Mathematical Physics, Article ID 632309. [Google Scholor]
  15. Mo, H. Sui, X. & Yu, D., (2014). Generalized convex functions on fractal sets and two related inequalities. Abstract and Applied Analysis, Article ID 636751, 7 pages. [Google Scholor]
  16. Sarikaya, M. Z., & Budak, H. (2017). Some integral inequalities for local fractional integrals. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 14(1), 9-19. [Google Scholor]
  17. Tseng, K. L., (2011). Some inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to Fejér inequality and weighted trapezoidal formula. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics,14(4), 1737–1747. [Google Scholor]
  18. Sarikaya, M., & Budak, H. (2017). Generalized Ostrowski type inequalities for local fractional integrals. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 145(4), 1527-1538.[Google Scholor]
  19. Sarikaya, M. Z., Erden, S., & Budak, H. (2016). Some generalized Ostrowski type inequalities involving local fractional integrals and applications. Advances in Inequalities and Applications, 2016, Article-63.[Google Scholor]
  20. Sarikaya, M. Z. & Budak, H., (2015). On generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality for generalized convex function. RGMIA Research Report Collection,18, Article 64, 15 pp.[Google Scholor]
  21. Sarikaya, M. Z., Budak, H., & Erden, S. (2019). On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for generalized convex functions. Korean Journal of Mathematics, 27(2), 277-293. [Google Scholor]