Starlikeness of meromorphic functions involving certain differential inequalities

Author(s): Kuldeep Kaur Shergill1, Sukhwinder Singh Billing1
1Department of Mathematics, Sri Guru Granth Sahib World University, Fatehgarh Sahib-140407(Punjab), India
Copyright © Kuldeep Kaur Shergill, Sukhwinder Singh Billing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In the present paper, we define a class of non-Bazilevic functions in punctured unit disk and study a differential inequality to obtain certain new criteria for starlikeness of meromorphic functions.

Keywords: Meromorphic function; Meromorphic starlike function.

1. Introduction

Let \(\Sigma\) be the class of functions of the form

\[f(z)=\frac{1}{z}+\sum_0^\infty a_nz^n,\] which are analytic in the punctured unit disc \( \mathbb E_0=\mathbb E\setminus\{0\},\) where \(\mathbb E = \{z:|z|\alpha,\hspace{1.7cm}(\alpha< 1;z \in \mathbb E).\] The class of such functions is denoted by \(\mathcal {MS}^*(\alpha)\) and the class of meromorphic starlike functions is denoted by \(\mathcal {MS}^*=\mathcal {MS}^*(0)\).

In the theory of meromorphic functions, many authors have obtained different sufficient conditions for meromorphically starlike functions. Some of them are stated below:

Kargar et al., [1] proved the following results:

Theorem 1. Assume that \(f(z)\neq 0\) for \(\mathbb E_0.\) If \(f\in\Sigma(p)\) satisfies \[\left|\frac{1}{\sqrt[p]{ f(z)}} \left(\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}+\right)+p\right| < p\lambda(\beta)|b(z)|, ~z\in\mathbb E_0,\] then \(f\) is a \(p\)-valently meromorphic strongly-starlike of order \(\beta\).

Theorem 2. Assume that \(f(z)\neq 0\) for \(\mathbb E_0.\) If \(f\in\Sigma\) satisfies \[\left|\left(\frac{f(z)}{z^{-\alpha}}\right)^\frac{1}{\alpha-1} \left(\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}+\frac{\alpha}{z}\right)+1-\alpha\right| < \frac{2}{\sqrt 5}, ~z\in\mathbb E_0,\] then \(f\) is meromorphic starlike function of order \(\alpha\).

Goswami et al., [2] proved the following results:

Theorem 3. If \(f(z) \in \Sigma_p,n\) with \(f(z)\neq 0\) for all \(z\in\mathbb E_0\), satisfies the following inequality \[\left|\displaystyle [z^p f(z)]^{\frac{1}{\alpha-p}}\left(\frac{z f'(z)}{f(z)}+\alpha\right)+p-\alpha\right|< \frac{(n+1)(p-\alpha)}{\sqrt{(n+1)^2+1}}, z\in\mathbb E, \] for some real values of \(\alpha~(0\leq\alpha< p)\), then \(f\in\mathcal{MS}_{p,n}^*(\alpha).\)

Theorem 4.If \(f(z) \in \Sigma_p,n\) with \(f(z)\neq 0\) for all \(z\in\mathbb E_0\) satisfies the following inequality \[\left|\frac{ \gamma [z^p f(z)]^\gamma}{z}\left(\frac{z f'(z)}{f(z)}+p\right)\right| \leq\frac{(n+1)}{2\sqrt{(n+1)^2+1}}, z\in\mathbb E, \] for \(\gamma\leq-\displaystyle\frac{1}{p}\), then \(f\in\mathcal{MS}_{p,n}^*\left(p+\displaystyle\frac{1}{\gamma}\right).\)

In [3], Sahoo et al., investigated a new class \(\mathcal{U}_n(\alpha,\lambda,\mu),\) of non-Bazilevic analytic functions by

\[\mathcal{U}_n(\alpha,\lambda,\mu)=\left\{f\in\mathcal {A}_n:\left|(1-\alpha)\left(\frac{z}{f(z)}\right)^\mu+\alpha f'(z)\left(\frac{z}{f(z)}\right)^{\mu+1}-1\right|< \lambda, ~z\in\mathbb E\right\}.\] For different choices of \(\mu\) with \(\alpha=1\), many authors has studied this class which are included in [4,5,6]. In this paper, we define above class of non-Bazilevic functions in punctured unit disk and study a differential inequality to obtain certain new criteria for starlikeness of meromorphic functions.

2. Main results

To prove our main result, we shall make use of following lemma of Hallenback and Ruscheweyh [7].

Lemma 1. Let G be a convex function in \(\mathbb E\), with \(G(0)=a\) and let \(\gamma\) be a complex number, with \(\Re(\gamma)>0\). If \(F(z)=a+a_nz^n+a_{n+1}z^{n+1}+\ldots\) , is analytic in \(\mathbb E\) nd \(F\prec G\), then \[\frac{1}{z^\gamma} \int^z_0 F(w)w^{\gamma-1}dw\prec \frac{1}{nz^{\frac{\gamma}{n}}}\int^z_0 G(w)w^{\frac{\gamma}{n}-1}dw .\]

Theorem 5. Let \(\alpha, \beta, \delta\) be real numbers such that \(\displaystyle \alpha0\), \(0\leq\delta< 1\) and let

\begin{equation} 0< M\equiv M(\alpha, \beta, \delta)=\displaystyle \frac{(\beta-\alpha)[2+\alpha(1-\delta)]}{\alpha[1+\beta(1-\delta)]}.\label{eqn1} \end{equation}
(1)
If \(f\in\Sigma\) satisfies the differential inequality
\begin{equation} \left|\left(\frac{1}{zf(z)}\right)^\beta \left(1+\alpha+\alpha\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)-1\right|< M(\alpha, \beta, \delta), ~z\in\mathbb E,\label{eqn2}\end{equation}
(2)
then \[-\Re\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)>\delta, ~z\in\mathbb E.\]

Proof. Let us define \[\left(\frac{1}{zf(z)}\right)^\beta=u(z),~z\in\mathbb E.\] Differentiate logarithmically, we obtain

\begin{equation} \frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}=-\left(1+\frac{zu'(z)}{\beta u(z)}\right).\label{eqn3}\end{equation}
(3)
Therefore, in view of (3), we have
\begin{equation} u(z)-\frac{\alpha}{\beta} zu'(z)\prec 1+Mz.\label{eqn4} \end{equation}
(4)
The use of Lemma 1 \(\left(taking~ \displaystyle\gamma =-\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\right)\) in (4) gives \[u(z)\prec1+\frac{\gamma Mz}{\gamma+1},\] or \[ |u(z)-1|< \frac{\beta M}{\beta-\alpha}< 1,\] therefore, we obtain
\begin{equation} |u(z)|>1-\frac{\beta M}{\beta-\alpha}. \end{equation}
(5)
Write \(\displaystyle -\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}=(1-\delta)w(z)+\delta,\) \(0\leq\delta< 1\) and therefore (2) reduces to \[|(1+\alpha) u(z)-\alpha u(z) [(1-\delta)w(z)+\delta]-1|0, ~z\in\mathbb E.\) If possible, suppose that \(\Re (w(z))\ngtr 0, ~z\in\mathbb E,\) then there must exist a point \(z_0\in\mathbb E\) such that \(w(z_0)=ix,x\in\mathbb R.\) To prove the required result, it is now sufficient to prove that
\begin{equation} |(1+\alpha) u(z_0)-\alpha u(z_0)[(1-\delta)ix+\delta]-1|\geq M.\label{eqn6}\end{equation}
(6)
By making use of (3), we have
\begin{align} |(1+\alpha) u(z_0)-\alpha u(z_0)[(1-\delta)ix+\delta]-1|&\geq|[1+\alpha(1-\delta)-\alpha(1-\delta)ix] u(z_0)|-1\notag\\ &=\sqrt{[1+\alpha(1-\delta)]^2+\alpha^2(1-\delta)^2x^2}~|u(z_0)|-1\notag\\ &\geq |1+\alpha(1-\delta)||u(z_0)|-1\notag\\ &\geq|1+\alpha(1-\delta)| \left(1-\frac{\beta M}{\beta-\alpha}\right)-1\geq M. \label{eqn7}\end{align}
(7)
Now (7) is true in view of (1) and therefore, (6) holds. Hence \(\Re(w(z))>0\), i.e., \[\displaystyle -\Re\left(\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)>\delta, ~0\leq\delta< 1, ~z\in\mathbb E.\]

Remark 1. Let \(\alpha, \beta, \delta\) be real numbers such that \(\displaystyle \alpha< \frac{2}{\delta-1},\) \(0\leq\delta0\) and if \( f(z)\in\Sigma\) satisfies \[\left|\left(\frac{1}{zf(z)}\right)^\beta \left(\frac{1}{\alpha}+1+\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)-\frac{1}{\alpha}\right|\delta, ~z\in\mathbb E.\]

Letting \(\alpha\rightarrow\infty\) in above remark, we get the following result:

Theorem 6. Let \(\beta, \delta\) be real numbers such that \(\beta>0, 0\leq\delta< 1\) and let \(f(z)\in\Sigma\) satisfy \[\left|\left(\frac{1}{zf(z)}\right)^\beta \left(1+\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)\right|\delta, ~z\in\mathbb E.\]

3. Deductions

Setting \(\beta=1\) in Theorem 5, we obtain

Corollary 1. Let \(\alpha\) and \(\delta\) be real numbers such that \(\displaystyle \alpha< \frac{2}{\delta-1},\) \(0\leq\delta< 1\) and suppose that \(f\in\Sigma\) satisfies \[\displaystyle \left|\frac{1}{zf(z)} \left(1+\alpha+\alpha\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)-1\right|\delta~, z\in\mathbb E,\] i.e., \(f\in\mathcal{MS}^*(\delta),~z\in\mathbb E.\)

Writing \(\delta=0\) in above corollary, we get the following result:

Corollary 2. Let \(f\in\Sigma\) satisfy \[\displaystyle\left|\frac{1}{zf(z)} \left(1+\alpha+\alpha\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)-1\right|< \frac{(1-\alpha)(2+\alpha)}{2\alpha},~z\in\mathbb E,\] then \(f\in\mathcal{MS}^*,~z\in\mathbb E\).

Setting \(\beta=1\) in Theorem 6, we get the following result:

Corollary 3. Let \(\delta\) be a real number such that \( 0\leq\delta< 1\) and let \(f(z)\in\Sigma\) satisfy \[\left|\frac{1}{zf(z)} \left(1+\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)\right|\delta, ~z\in\mathbb E.\]

Setting \(\delta=0\) in above corollary, we get the following result:

Corollary 4. Let \(f(z)\in\Sigma\) satisfy \[\left|\frac{1}{zf(z)} \left(1+\frac{zf'(z)}{f(z)}\right)\right|< \displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\] then \(f\in\mathcal{MS}^*,~z\in\mathbb E\).

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References:

  1. Kargar, R., Ebadian, A., & Sokol, J. (2016). On p-Valently Meromorphic-Strongly Starlike and Convex Functions. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 12(1), 62-65. [Google Scholor]
  2. Goswami, P., Bulboaca, T., & Alqahtani, R. T. (2016). Simple sufficient conditions for starlikeness and convexity for meromorphic functions. Open Mathematics, 14(1), 557-566. [Google Scholor]
  3. Sahoo, P., Singh, S., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Some starlikeness conditions for the analytic functions and integral transforms. Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Application, 2011, 1-10. [Google Scholor]
  4. Obradovic, M. (1998). A class of univalent functions I. Hokkaido Mathematical Journal, 27(2), 329-335. [Google Scholor]
  5. Obradovic, M. (1999). A class of univalent functions II. Hokkaido Mathematical Journal, 28(3), 557-562. [Google Scholor]
  6. Obradovic, M., Ponnusamy, S., Singh, V., & Vasundhra, P. (2002). Univalency, starlikeness and convexity applied to certain classes of rational functions. Analysis-International Mathematical Journal of Analysis and its Application, 22(3), 225-242. [Google Scholor]
  7. Hallenbeck, D. J., & Ruscheweyh, S. (1975). Subordination by convex functions. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 52(1), 191-195. [Google Scholor]