Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\) vertices, \(m\) edges, and a sequence of vertex degrees \(\Delta=d_1\geq d_2\geq\cdots\geq d_n=\delta >0\). Denote by \(\mu_1\geq \mu_2\geq\cdots\geq \mu_{n-1}>\mu_n=0\) the Laplacian eigenvalues of \(G\). The Kirchhoff index of \(G\) is defined as \(Kf(G)=n\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1}{\mu_i}\). A couple of new lower bounds for \(Kf(G)\) that depend on \(n\), \(m\), \(\Delta\) and some other graph invariants are obtained.
Let \(G=(V,E)\), \(V=\{v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_n\}\), be a simple connected graph with \(n\) vertices, \(m\) edges and let \(\Delta=d_1\geq d_2\geq\cdots\geq d_n=\delta >0\), \(d_i=d(v_i)\), be a sequence of vertex degrees of \(G\). If vertices \(v_i\) and \(v_j\) are adjacent we write \(v_i\sim v_j\) or, for brevity, \(i\sim j\).
In graph theory, an invariant is a property of graphs that depends only on their abstract structure, not on the labeling of vertices or edges. Such quantities are also referred to as topological indices. The topological indices are an important class of molecular structure descriptors used for quantifying information on molecules. Many of them are defined as simple functions of the degrees of the vertices of (molecular) graph (see e.g. [1, 2, 3]). Historically, the first vertex-degree-based (VDB) structure descriptors were the graph invariants that are nowadays called Zagreb indices. The first and the second Zagreb index, \(M_1\) and \(M_2\), are defined as $$ M_1(G)=\sum_{i=1}^n d_i^2\,, $$ and $$ M_2(G)=\sum_{i\sim j} d_id_j\,. $$ The quantity \(M_1\) was first time considered in 1972 [4], whereas \(M_2\) in 1975 [5]. These were named Zagreb group indices [6] (in view of the fact that the authors of [4, 5] were members of the “Rudjer Bov sković” Institute in Zagreb, Croatia). Eventually, the name was shortened into first Zagreb index and second Zagreb index [7]. In [4] another topological index defined as sum of cubes of vertex degrees, that is $$ F(G)=\sum_{i=1}^n d_i^3\,, $$ was encountered. However, for the unknown reasons, it did not attracted any attention until 2015 when it was reinvented in [8] and named the {\it forgotten topological index}. % Details of the theory and applications of these topological indices can be found, for example, in [9, 10]. In [11] Fajtlowicz defined a topological index called the inverse degree, \(ID(G)\), as $$ ID(G)=\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{d_i}. $$ Here we are interested in a graph invariant called the Kirchhoff index, which was introduced by Klein and Randić in [12]. It is defined as $$ Kf(G)=\sum_{i< j}r_{ij}, $$ where \(r_{ij}\) is the resistance distance between the vertices \(v_i\) and \(v_j\), i.e. \(r_{ij}\) is equal to the resistance between equivalent points on an associated electrical network obtained by replacing each edge of \(G\) by a unit (1 ohm) resistor. The Kirchhoff index has a very nice purely mathematical interpretation. Namely, in [13] and [14] it was demonstrated that the Kirchhoff index of a connected graph can also be represented as $$ Kf(G)=n\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1}{\mu_i}, $$ where \(\mu_1\geq \mu_2\geq\cdots\geq\mu_{n-1}>\mu_n=0\) are the Laplacian eigenvalues of \(G\). In this paper we obtain new lower bounds for \(Kf(G)\) which depend on some of the graph structural parameters and above mentioned topological indices. Before we proceed, let us define one special class of \(d\)-regular graphs \(\Gamma_d\) [15]. Let \(N(i)\) be a set of all neighbors of vertex \(i\), i.e. \(N(i)=\{k\, |\, k\in V,\, k\sim i\}\), and \(d(i,j)\) the distance between vertices \(i\) and \(j\). Denote by \(\Gamma_d\) a set of all \(d\)-regular graphs, \(1\leq d\leq n-1\), with diameter \(D=2\) and \(|N(i)\cap N(j)|=d\) for \(i\nsim j\).Lemma 1. [16] Let \(p=(p_i)\), \(i=1,2,\ldots,n\), be a nonnegative real number sequence and \(a=(a_i)\), \(i=1,2,\ldots,n\), a positive real number sequence. Then for any real \(r\), such that \(r\geq 1\) or \(r\leq 0\), holds
Lemma 2. [17] Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices. Then
Theorem 3. Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices and \(m\) edges. If \(G\) is \(d\)-regular graph, \(1\le d\le n-1\), then
Proof. If \(G\) is \(d\)-regular graph, \(1\le d\le n-1\), then $$ ID(G)=\frac{n}{d}. $$ From the above and (2) we arrive at (3). For \(r=2\), \(p_i:=\frac{\Delta}{d_i}-1\), \(a_i:=d_i\), \(i=1,2,\ldots,n\), the inequality (1) becomes $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\frac{\Delta}{d_i}-1 \right)\sum_{i=1}^{n} (\Delta-d_i)d_i\geq \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} (\Delta-d_i)\right)^{2}, $$ that is
Remark 1. According to (4) follows $$ Kf(G)\geq \dfrac{n(n-1)-\Delta}{\Delta}, $$ which was proven in [15].
Corollary 4. Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices and \(m\) edges. If \(G\cong K_n\), then $$ Kf(G)=n-1. $$ Otherwise
Proof. For \(r=2\), \(p_i:=\frac{n-1}{d_i}-1\), \(a_i:=d_i\), \(i=1,2,\ldots,n\), the inequality (1) transforms into $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(\frac{n-1}{d_i}-1 \right)\sum_{i=1}^{n} (n-1-d_i)d_i\geq \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n} (n-1-d_i)\right)^{2}, $$ that is
Remark 2. In [19] the following was proven
Corollary 5. Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices and \(m\) edges. Then
Proof. The inequality (9) is obtained according to (6) and inequality $$ M_1(G)\ge \frac{4m^2}{n}, $$ which was proven in [20] (see also [21, 22]). The inequality (9) was proven in [23] (see also [18]).
The proof of the next theorem is fully analogous to that of the Theorem 3, hence omitted.Theorem 6. Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices and \(m\) edges. If \(G\) is \(d\)-regular graph, \(1\le d\le n-1\), then the inequality (3) holds. Otherwise
Corollary 7. Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices and \(m\) edges. If \(G\cong K_n\), then $$ Kf(G)=n-1. $$ If \(G\ncong K_n\), then
Corollary 12. Let \(G\) be a simple connected graph with \(n\ge 2\) vertices and \(m\) edges. If \(G\cong K_n\), then $$ Kf(G)=n-1. $$ If \(G\ncong K_n\), then
Proof. The inequality (12) is obtained from (11) and inequality \(F(G)\ge 2M_2(G)\).
Remark 3. In [24] a vertex–degree–based topological index called the Lanzhou index, \(Lz(G)\), is defined as $$ Lz(G)=\sum_{i=1}^n (n-1-d_i)d_i^2. $$ According to (11) the following relation between topological indices \(Kf(G)\) and \(Lz(G)\) follows $$ (Kf(G)-n+1)Lz(G)^{1/2}\geq (n(n-1)-2m)^{3/2}, $$ with equality holding if and only if \(G\cong K_n\), or \(G\cong K_{1,n-1}\), or \(G\in \Gamma_d\).