A variety of uncertainty principles for the Hankel-Stockwell transform

Author(s): Khaled Hleili1,2
1Preparatory Institute for Engineering Studies of Kairouan, Department of Mathematics, Kairouan university, Tunisia.
2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Northern Borders University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Copyright © Khaled Hleili. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this work, we establish \(L^p\) local uncertainty principle for the Hankel-Stockwell transform and we deduce \(L^p\) version of Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl uncertainty principle. Next, By combining these principles and the techniques of Donoho-Stark we present uncertainty principles of concentration type in the \(L^p\) theory, when \(1\)<\(p\leqslant2\). Finally, Pitt’s inequality and Beckner’s uncertainty principle are proved for this transform.

Keywords: Hankel-Stockwell transform, local uncertainty principles, Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl inequality, concentration uncertainty principles, Pitt’s inequality, Beckner’s inequality.

1. Introduction

In harmonic analysis, uncertainty principles play an important role. It states that a non-zero function and its Fourier transform cannot be simultaneously sharply concentrated. many of them have already been studied from several points of view for the Fourier transform, Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl inequality [1] and local uncertainty inequality [2]. As a classical uncertainty principle, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has been extended to transforms such as the spherical mean transforms [3,4], the Dunkl transform [5] and so forth.

The Hankel transform \(\mathcal{H}_\alpha\) is defined for every integrable function \(f\) on \(\mathbb{R}_+=[0,+\infty[\) with respect to the measure \(d\nu_\alpha\), by

\begin{equation*} \mathcal{H}_\alpha(f)(\lambda)=\int_0^{+\infty}f(x)j_\alpha(\lambda x)d\nu_\alpha(x),\end{equation*} where \(d\nu_\alpha\) is the measure defined on \(\mathbb{R}_+ \) by \[d\nu_\alpha(x)=\frac{x^{2\alpha+1}}{2^{\alpha}\Gamma(\alpha+1)}dx,\] and \(j_\alpha\) is the modified Bessel function given in the next section.

The Hankel transform is found as a very useful mathematical tool in many fields of physics, signal processing and other [6,7]. Also, many uncertainty principles related to this transform \(\mathcal{H}_\alpha\) have been proved [8,9,10].

Time-frequency analysis plays an important role in harmonic analysis, in particular in signal theory. With the development of time-frequency analysis, the study of uncertainty principles have gained considerable attention and have been extended to a wide class of integral transforms such as Weinstein transforms [11,12], Dunkl transforms [13], Hankel-Stockwell transforms [14] and so on.

Based on the ideas of Faris [15] and Price [2,16], we show a general form of the local uncertainty principles for the Hankel-Stockwell transform and we deduce \(L^p\) version of Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl uncertainty principle. We shall use also the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the properties of the Hankel-Stockwell transform and the techniques of Donoho-Stark [17,18], we show a continuous-time principle for the \(L^p\) theory, when \(1 < p \leqslant 2\). Finally, Pitt's inequality and Beckner's uncertainty principle are proved for this transform.

This work is organized as follows; in Section 2 we recall some harmonic analysis results related to the Hankel transform. In Section 3, we present some elements of harmonic analysis related to the Hankel-Stockwell transform. In Section 4, we introduce some uncertainty principles for this transform.

2. The Hankel transform

In this section, we summarize some harmonic analysis tools related to the Hankel transform that will be used hereafter, (see [19]). The modified Bessel function \(x\longmapsto j_{\alpha}(x)\) has the following integral representation [20,21]; \begin{alignat*}{2} j_{\alpha}(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{2\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}\int_0^1(1-t^2)^{\alpha-\frac{1}{2}}\cos(x t)dt, & \hbox{if \(\alpha>\frac{-1}{2}\);} \\ \cos x, & \hbox{if \(\alpha=\frac{-1}{2}\).} \end{array} \right. \end{alignat*} In particular, for every \(x\in\mathbb{R}\) and \(k\in\mathbb{N}\), we have \begin{equation*} \left|j_{\alpha}^{(k)}(x)\right|\leqslant 1.\end{equation*} We define the Hankel translation operators \(\tau_x\), \(x\in[0,+\infty[\) by \begin{eqnarray*} \tau_x(f)(y)=\left \{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(\alpha+\frac{1}{2})}}\int_{0}^{\pi}f(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+2xy\cos\theta},x+y)\sin^{2\alpha}(\theta) d\theta , &\hbox{if \(\alpha >\frac{-1}{2}\),}\\ \frac{f(x+y)+f(|x-y|)}{2} ,& \hbox{if \(\alpha=\frac{-1}{2},\)} \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray*} whenever the integral in the right-hand side is well defined. In the following, we denote by;
  • \(S_e(\mathbb{R})\) the

References:

  1. Cowling, M. G., & Price, J. F. (1984). Bandwidth versus time concentration: the Heisenberg-Pauli-Weyl inequality. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 15(1), 151-165. [Google Scholor]
  2. Price, J. F. (1983). Inequalities and local uncertainty principles. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 24(7), 1711-1714. [Google Scholor]
  3. Hleili, K. (2018). Uncertainty principles for spherical mean \(L^2\)-multiplier operators. Journal of Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications, 9(3), 573-587. [Google Scholor]
  4. Hleili, K. (2020). Some results for the windowed Fourier transform related to the spherical mean operator. Acta Mathematica Vietnamica, 2020, 1-23. [Google Scholor]
  5. Rosler, M. (1999). An uncertainty principle for the Dunkl transform. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 59(3), 353-360. [Google Scholor]
  6. Banerjee, P. P., Nehmetallah, G., & Chatterjee, M. R. (2005). Numerical modeling of cylindrically symmetric nonlinear self-focusing using an adaptive fast Hankel split-step method. Optics communications, 249(1-3), 293-300. [Google Scholor]
  7. Lohmann, A. W., Mendlovic, D., Zalevsky, Z., & Dorsch, R. G. (1996). Some important fractional transformations for signal processing. Optics Communications, 125(1-3), 18-20. <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=+Some+important+fractional+transformations+for+signal+processing.+[Google Scholor]
  8. Bowie, P. C. (1971). Uncertainty inequalities for Hankel transforms. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 2(4), 601-606. [Google Scholor]
  9. Omri, S. (2011). Logarithmic uncertainty principle for the Hankel transform. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 22(9), 655-670. [Google Scholor]
  10. Tuan, V. K. (2007). Uncertainty principles for the Hankel transform. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 18(5), 369-381. [Google Scholor]
  11. Hleili, K. (2018). Continuous wavelet transform and uncertainty principle related to the Weinstein operator. Integral Transforms and Special Functions, 29(4), 252-268. [Google Scholor]
  12. Hleili, K.(2020). A dispersion inequality and accumulated spectrograms in the weinstein setting. Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 12(1), 51-70. [Google Scholor]
  13. Ghobber, S. (2015). Shapiro’s uncertainty principle in the Dunkl setting. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 92(1), 98-110. [Google Scholor]
  14. Hamadi, N. B., Hafirassou, Z., & Herch, H. (2020). Uncertainty principles for the Hankel-Stockwell transform. Journal of Pseudo-Differential Operators and Applications, 11(2), 543-564. [Google Scholor]
  15. Faris, W. G. (1978). Inequalities and uncertainty principles. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 19(2), 461-466. [Google Scholor]
  16. Price, J. F. (1987). Sharp local uncertainty inequalities. Studia Mathematica, 85, 37-45. [Google Scholor]
  17. Donoho, D. L., & Stark, P. B. (1989). Uncertainty principles and signal recovery. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 49(3), 906-931. [Google Scholor]
  18. Soltani, F. (2014). \(L^p\) local uncertainty inequality for the Sturm-Liouville transform. Cubo (Temuco), 16(1), 95-104. [Google Scholor]
  19. Schwartz, A. L. (1969). An inversion theorem for Hankel transforms. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 22(3), 713-717. [Google Scholor]
  20. Andrews, G. E., Askey, R., & Roy, R. (1999). Special Functions (No. 71). Cambridge university press. [Google Scholor]
  21. Silverman, R. A. (1972). Special Functions and their Applications. Dover Publications. [Google Scholor]