In this paper, we establish sharp inequalities for trigonometric functions. We prove in particular for
Moreover, bounds are obtained for other trigonometric inequalities as Huygens and Cusa inequalities as well as for the function
Inequalities involving trigonometric functions are used in many
applications in various fields of mathematics. The method to compare
functions to their corresponding Taylor polynomials has been
successfully applied to prove and approximate a lot of trigonometric
inequalities [1].
A method called the natural approach, introduced by Mortici in [2], uses the idea of comparing
functions to their corresponding Taylor polynomials. This method has
been successfully applied to prove and approximate a wide category of
trigonometric inequalities.
Let us consider the double inequality
In this paper we provide another natural approach by comparing functions with their corresponding Taylor polynomials. This approach is analog to that given by [2]. As a corollary, that permits us to extend and sharpen results related to trigonometric inequalities and give generalizations and refinements.
In particular, the following inequalities have recently been established
Statement 1. [4,Theorem 1 p.4] for
Notice that this statement is finer that provided by Mortici [2] :
Statement 2. [4,Theorem 3 p.7] for
Statement 3. [5,Theorem] Neuman-Sandor for
Statement 4. Cheng and Paris proved (Theorem 3.4
(3.23) of [6])
Statement 5. [4,Theorem 4 p.9] for
In this paper, we aim to refine all the inequalities mentioned above.
In [7] one proved for
To that end, we will consider a function
At first, consider the following technical lemma which has been proved by [[8] , Lemma 3.1], but the proof we give here is slightly different.
Lemma 1. For
Proof. The following series expansions can be found in [9]
Then for
Notice that
In the other hand we know that for
Our first result Theorem 1 motivated us to further refine the
Adamovic-Mitrinovic inequality. It permits us to deduce the lower bound
of
Theorem 1.
For
where
Proof. By Lemma 1 the function
Lemma 2. consider the real analytic
functions
We may find an elegant proof of this Lemma in [15,Malesevic-Rasajski-Lutovac,Theorem 4] .
Moreover, if we suppose in addition
Applying the preceding to the function
Some particular cases of Theorem 1 are given below.
Let us introduce some examples of the inequalities obtained for
Putting
Proposition 1. For
Taking
Taking
Putting
Remark 1. Notice that when the degree
Indeed, consider the difference
For
For
The following result provided new bounds for the function
Lemma 3. For
Let
Here is an improvement of this Lemma which will be useful to refine the
bounds of the function.
Lemma 4. For
Indeed, since [[11], p.145]
Now, we will proceed as above, we will use Taylor’s approximation for
this function to provide bounds for
Theorem 2. For
By Theorem 1 we are able to improve the left hand
inequality 3. Indeed, one has the following
Turn to statement 1. In [[4], Theorem 1] the authors proved for
By increasing the degree
In this case, taking
recall that we have for
Then we obtain thanks to Maple
Then for
Other examples We interest here in the
right part on the inequality. By the Taylor approximation we get the
bound [[11], p.145]
Putting
Remark 2. By the same way we may improve another
bound of [4]: for
A conjecture More generally, all the
examples studied above naturally suggest that we may expect that the
following inequalities hold
Other refinements
We may prove the following frame which also improves the one of Mortici
The following are stronger
For
For
In particular
Notice that we have an equivalence between inequalities
By using the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Baricz and Sandor
have pointed out that this inequality implies
The following inequality which is due to Huygens
Mortici [2] showed
Cheng and Paris proved (Theorem 3.4 (3.23) of [6])
The following result improves the one of Mortici [[2],p.]
Theorem 3. For
Proof. Notice that for
Write
We need the lemma
Lemma 5. For
Indeed, the Euler numbers verify the following frame, [12] [AS, p.805]
On the other hand, recall that for
The right inequality of Theorem 3 is then
proved.
Turn now to statement 2
Theorem 4. For
Proof. Write the difference
That means the following inequalities hold and implying statement 2
Theorem 5. For
Proof. We need this lemma
Lemma 6. Consider the function
Then
Indeed , since
This implies that
Theorem 6. For
Theorem 6 implies obviously statement 4.
Proof. For
The following inequality
Mortici [4] proved
Theorem 7. For
Proof. Remark at first we may write obviously
Lemma 7. For
By Lemma 1 and Theorem 1 we may deduce
that
Therefore since by [[9], p.]
Let us consider now expansions trigonometric functions with power
series. We will use the Taylor expansions of
On the other hand, we know that
Lemma 8. For
Indeed,
Examples Let
– Taking
Etc…
In the sequel we will find upper and lower bounds of Huygens
inequalities which appear to be finer than known previous. Consider at
first
Lemma 9. For
Let us consider expansions trigonometric functions with power series.
We will use the Taylor expansions of
We then derive the following which improves Theorem 7
Theorem 8. For
Corollary 1. For
Corollary 1 means that the following inequalities hold
Examples Let
Etc…
Wu and Srivastava [15,Lemma 3] proved
the following dual inequality
Mortici refined a result of Neuman and Sandor [5,Theorem 2.3], who showed
Rasajski, M., Lutovac, T., & Malesevic, B. (2018). Sharpening and generalizations of Shafer-Fink and Wilker type inequalities: A new approach. Journal of Nonlinear Science and Applications, 11, 885-893.