Search for Articles:

Contents

The smallest radius of a ball containing the support of a compactly supported potential

Alexander G. Ramm1
1Department of Mathematics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
Copyright © Alexander G. Ramm. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Let \(D\subset \mathbb{R}^3\) be a bounded domain. \(q\in C(D)\) be a real-valued compactly supported potential, \(A(\beta, \alpha,k)\) be its scattering amplitude, \(k>0\) be fixed, without loss of generality we assume \(k=1\), \(\beta\) be the unit vector in the direction of scattered field, \(\alpha\) be the unit vector in the direction of the incident field. Assume that the boundary of \(D\) is a smooth surface \(S\). Assume that \(D\subset Q_a:=\{x: |x|\le a\}\), and \(a>0\) is the minimal number such that \(q(x)=0\) for \(|x|>a\). Formula is derived for \(a\) in terms of the scattering amplitude.

Keywords: scattering theory, potential scattering, compactly supported potentials, the smallest radius of the ball containing the support of the potential

1. Introduction

Let \(D\subset {\mathbb R}^3\) be a bounded domain. \(q\in C(D)\) be a real-valued compactly supported potential, \(S\) is a smooth boundary of \(D\), \(A(\beta, \alpha,k)\) be its scattering amplitude, \(k>0\) be fixed, we assume \(k=1\) without loss of generality, \(\beta\) be the unit vector in the direction of scattered field, \(\alpha\) be the unit vector in the direction of the incident field. Assume that \(D\subset Q_a:=\{x: |x|\le a\}\), \(a>0\) is the minimal number such that \(q(x)=0\) for \(|x|>a\), \(\gamma\) is the unit vector such that \(a\gamma\in S\), and for any small \(\epsilon>0\) one has \(\int_{D_\eta}|q(x)|^2dx>0\), where \(D_\eta\) is the part of \(D\) in a neighborhood of the point \(a\gamma\) in the region \(a-\epsilon<|x|<a\). This makes \(c_2>0\) in formula (6) below for an arbitrary small \(\eta>0\).

The known formula for the scattering amplitude is (see, for example, [1, 2]): \[\label{e1} A(\beta, \alpha, k)=-\frac 1 {4\pi}\int_D e^{-ik\beta \cdot x} q(x)u(x,\alpha,k) dx, \tag{1}\] where \(u(x,\alpha,k)\) is the scattering solution (see, for example, [1], pp.256–259, [2], pp.359–439). Since \(k>0\) is fixed, we omit the dependence on \(k\) in what follows. The scattering amplitude corresponding to a compactly supported potential \(q\in L^2(D)\) is an analytic function of \(\beta\) and \(\alpha\) on the complex variety \(M:=\{z\in C^3, z\cdot z=1\}, z\cdot z:=\sum_{j=1}^3 z_j^2.\), see [1].

Our goal is to derive a formula for the \(a\) in terms of the scattering amplitude.

Let us formulate some facts. A proof of the first fact can be found in [1].; the second fact is well known.

A proof of the basic result of this research note, Theorem 1, is given in §2.
Fact 1. There exists \(\nu(\alpha, \theta)\in L^2(S^2)\) such that \[\label{e2} -4\pi \int_{S^2}A(\beta, \alpha)\nu(\alpha, \theta)d\alpha=\int_D e^{-i(\beta-\theta) \cdot x} q(x) dx (1+O(\frac 1 {|\theta|})), \hspace{2cm} |\theta|\to \infty, \tag{2}\] where \[\theta\in M:=\{z\in C^3, z\cdot z=1\}, \hspace{5mm} z\cdot z= \sum_{j=1}^3 z_j^2.\]

Estimate (2) is proved in [1], pp. 260–261. A numerical procedure for calculating \(\nu(\alpha,\theta)\) is given in [1], pp. 265-266.

If \(u,v\) are real-valued vectors in \({\mathbb R}^3\), and \(z=u+iv\), then \(z\cdot z=1\) if and only if \[(u,u)-(v,v)=1, \hspace{2cm} (u,v)+(v,u)=0,\] where \((u,v):=\sum_{j=1}^3 u_j v_j\), \(|v|^2=(v,v)\).

It follows from (2) that if \(\beta-\theta=\xi\), \(\beta, \theta \in M\), and \(|\theta|\to \infty\), then \[\label{e3} \lim_{|\theta|\to \infty}[-4\pi \int_{S^2}A(\beta, \alpha)\nu(\alpha, \theta)d\alpha]=Q(\xi), \tag{3}\] where \(Q(\xi):=\int_D q(x)e^{-i\xi \cdot x}dx\) is the Fourier transform of \(q\).
Fact 2. If \(q\in L^2(D)\) is compactly supported, then its Fourier transform is an entire function of exponential type.

In §2 we prove that the the smallest number \(a>0\) such that the ball \(B_a\) contains the support of \(q\) can be calculated by the formula: \[\label{e4} a=\overline{\lim}_{|v|\to \infty}\frac{||Q(u+iv)||}{|v|}. \tag{4}\]

Here \(||Q(u)||^2=(2\pi )^3\int_{{\mathbb R}^3} |q(x)|^2 dx\), \(\|Q(u+iv)\|^2=(2\pi )^3\int_{{\mathbb R}^3} |q(x)|^2 e^{2v\cdot x}dx\).

Theorem 1. Assume that \(q\in L^2(D)\) is real-valued. Then the smallest radius of the ball containing the support of the potential is given by (4).

In §2 a proof of Theorem 1 is given.

2. Proof of Theorem 1

By Plansherel’s formula one gets \[\label{e5} ||Q(u+iv)||^2= (2\pi )^3\int_{D} e^{2v\cdot x}|q(x)|^2 dx\le c^2 e^{2|v|a}, \hspace {1cm} c^2:=(2\pi )^3\int_D |q(x)|^2 dx. \tag{5}\]

Let us prove an estimate from below: \[\label{e6} ||Q(u+iv)||^2\ge c^2_2\eta e^{2|v|(a-\eta)}, \hspace {1cm} c^2_2=\int_{D_\eta} |q|^2dx, \tag{6}\] where \(\eta>0\) is arbitrarily small, and \(D_\eta\) is sufficiently small, so that \(\cos (x, \gamma)>1-\eta_1\), where \(\eta_1\) is sufficiently small, \(\gamma\) is a unit vector such that \(a\gamma\in \partial {S}\), \(S\) is the boundary of \(D\). Thus, \(v\cdot x>|v||x|(1-\eta)\). From (5)–(6) one gets: \[\label{e7} c_2e^{|v|a(1-\eta)}\le ||Q(u+iv)||\le c e^{|v|a}. \tag{7}\]

Taking natural logarithm of (7), dividing by \(|v|\) and taking \(|v|\to \infty\) yields formula (4).

Theorem 1 is proved. \(\Box\)

The main novelty in this short note is formula (4). This formula differs from the known result: the Paley-Wiener theorem ([3], p.181).

How can one choose the function \(\nu(\alpha, \theta)\) in (3)?

Let us give a method for doing this. This method is outlined on p. 266 in [1].

For \(|x|>a\) the scattering solution \[u(x,\alpha)=e^{i\alpha \cdot x}+\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty A_\ell(\alpha)Y_\ell(x_0)h_\ell(r),\] where \(x_0:=\frac x{|x|}\), \(r:=|x|\), \(h_\ell(r)\) are spherical Hankel functions (see [1], p.262), \[A_\ell(\alpha)=\int_{S^2}A(\beta, \alpha)\overline{Y_\ell(\beta)}d\beta,\] and \(Y_\ell(\beta)\) are the normalized sperical harmonics (see [1], pp261–263).

Definition 1. \[\label{e8} \rho(x)=e^{-i\theta\cdot x}\int_{S^2}u(x,\alpha)\nu(\alpha, \theta')d\alpha -1, \tag{8}\] where \(\theta'-\theta=\xi\), \(\theta, \theta'\in M\), \(|\theta|\to \infty\).

It is proved in [1], p. 265-266, that \(||\rho||_{|x|\le a}\le c|\theta|^{-1}, \hspace{0.25cm} |\theta|\to \infty\). Therefore, \(\nu(\alpha, \theta)\) can be chosen as the solution to the minimization problem: \(||\rho||_{a\le|x|\le b}=min\), where minimization is taken over \(\nu(\alpha, \theta)\in L^2(S^2)\), and \(0<a<b\) are two arbitrary numbers. Practically \(b-a\) can be chosen of the order of \(1\).

The reader may generalize Theorem 1 by assuming that \(q\in L^2(D)\) rather than \(q\in C(D)\).

3. Conclusion

A formula is given for the radius of the smallest ball containing the support of a compactly supported potential \(q(x)\). It is assumed that \(q\in L^2(D)\) is a real-valued potential, and \(D\subset {\mathbb R}^3\) is a bounded domain.

References

  1. Ramm, A. G. (2005). Inverse Problems. Springer.

  2. Ramm, A. G. (2017). Scattering by Obstacles and Potentials. World Scientific.

  3. Rudin, W. (1973). Functional Analysis. McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York.